![]() Most high-end iPhone apps involve extensive use of storyboards, and the support for them on AppCode is fairly sub-standard. Storyboarding – And we arrive at the biggest advantage that Xcode still holds over the IntelliJ IDEA AppCode.Customization in Xcode is, at best, mediocre – and it’s not surprising that many developers are prepared to spend those extra few minutes to set up AppCode just like they want. Developers can tweak around the font colours and styles, coding methods, and even the menu structure ( both the appearance as well as the order in which items appear ). The default theme of the former (taken from Xcode) can be adjusted to reduce the look and feel of a Java environment. Most iPhone app development experts who have ‘ switched ’ to AppCode feel that enhanced, all-round customization is the greatest single advantage that AppCode holds over Xcode. Personalization options – Hardly any comparison here.The number of file finders in AppCode might be more, but locating and accessing specific files in Xcode is not at all problematic either. On AppCode, there are four different file finders, while Xcode has its own method for fuzzy finding files and classes. The two IDEs offer entirely different file navigation systems for Apple developers – and both are equally developer-friendly. Navigating through code files – Nothing to pick between the two here.From enums and variables, to classes, constants, files and practically every other section of app codes – AppCode provides much easier and faster renaming options than what Xcode does. For playing around with method signatures, AppCode has three different values ( 0, Null and No ) that can be passed through parameters. All that the Obj-C programmers for iOS have to do is hit ‘Shift-F6’ → (type the new name) → Enter, and continue typing without any interruptions. AppCode does away with all such chances of refactoring mistakes and associated delays. The built-in tool for method signature refactoring is nothing to write home about either ( many developers have reported about its unreliability ). On Xcode, the ‘Rename…’ command has to be used for renaming the names of classes globally – and the process is uncertain, slow, and can cause other unnecessary changes as well. Refactoring tasks – This round is a huge #win for Appcode.You can work with AppCode, but while developing iOS apps, you cannot ever fully ditch Xcode. AppCode is an IDE that is meant to SUPPLANT Xcode, and not REPLACE it altogether. On OX 10.11 El Capitan, AppCode 3 requires Xcode 7.1 or higher ( Xcode 6.4 is the minimum requirement for OS X 10.10 systems ). To put it differently, a mobile app developer needs to have Xcode installed on his/her system, before even thinking about using AppCode. Interdependence – AppCode requires Xcode, but the opposite is not true.Xcode is also fairly neat, and is probably a touch more accurate than AppCode – but the extra features of the latter do make a difference. What’s more, AppCode prompts developers whenever they write out code blocks that are never going to be hit. Variables and code blocks that are not in use get automatically grayed out/disabled in the IntelliJ IDEA platform IDE, while creating ternary expressions with ‘ if-then ’ blocks is a convenient option. Coding for apps – Writing the codes for iPhone apps is fairly easy with either IDE, although the superior code completion features of AppCode ( much like other JetBrains tools ) would put it at a slight edge.We will, in what follows, perform a Xcode vs AppCode comparative study, and try to find out which one is more developer-friendly: While Xcode is, of course, a must-have tool for iOS app development, many developers feel that AppCode has the tools to emerge as a more-than-worthy competitor. However, that was not the only big news in November related to integrated development environments ( IDEs ) for the iOS platform – with the latest iteration of the Java-based AppCode ( version 3.3.1 ) also coming out a week earlier. A couple of weeks back, Apple released the fourth beta of Xcode 7.2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |